Investigatory powers costs not up to the job

Posted by on Apr 16, 2016 in Investigatory powers |


The UK s investigatory powers costs receives its second reading on Tuesday. At present the draft law cannot fulfill international standards for surveillance powers. It requires considerable revisions to do so.Initially, a law that offers public authorities generalised access to electronic interactions contents jeopardizes the essence of the essential right to privacy and might be illegal. The investigatory powers expense does this with its bulk interception warrants and bulk equipment disturbance warrants.


Second, international standards need that interception authorisations identify a particular target a person or premises for security. The investigatory powers expense also fails this standard because it allows targeted interception warrants to use to groups or individuals, organisations, or premises.

Third, those who authorise interceptions must have the ability to confirm a sensible suspicion on the basis of a factual case. The investigatory powers expense does not point out sensible suspicion or even suspects and there is no have to show criminal involvement or a threat to nationwide security.

These are worldwide requirements discovered in judgments of the European court of justice and the European court of human rights, and in the current opinion of the UN special rapporteur for the right to personal privacy. At present the bill cannot meet these standards the law is unfit for function.

If the law is not fit for purpose, unnecessary and expensive litigation will follow, and additional reform will be needed. We advise members of the Commons and the Lords to make sure that the future investigatory powers legislation satisfies these global standards. Such a law could lead the world.

Read More

Superstar law watch: Pop stars in the news

Posted by on Apr 16, 2016 in Law Watch |


It s been a hectic week, law-wise, for a few of the world s most famous musicians so much so that you might be forgiven for thinking they re getting to grips with Lord Denning s popular aphorism:Take former Beatle and global superstar Paul McCartney. The 73 year-old supposedly introduced legal procedures in December, in a bid to claw back the rights to his and John Lennon s songs, consisting of classics like Come Together and Don t Let Me Down.


The songs are currently Sony s legal property but thankfully for McCartney the United States Copyright Act suggests that songwriters can recover the ownership of their songs after a specific time period. For McCartney that s 56 years, suggesting the pop star will need to wait up until a minimum of 2018 prior to he ll be given his opportunity.

Perhaps things will move a little quicker for anguished pop star Madonna, who for the past couple of months has been involved in a prominent, high-drama legal conflict with her ex-hubby Guy Ritchie.

The long-running squabble concerns who ought to get custody of the pair s 15 year-old son Rocco, who is presently dealing with his dad in London.

Following Madonna and Ritchie s divorce in 2008, it was concurred that Rocco would reside in America with his mom however also invest a long time with his father. A household court judge approved this contract, however it doesn t resemble Ritchie and his boy have taken much notification, for the past few months anyhow.

Rocco visited his father in London last December and has actually ended up remaining there, much to his 57-year-old mother s upset and displeasure. The irregular behavior shown by the vocalist, who is currently on a world tour, since proceedings started has been well documented.

But is Madonna lastly making some development? British judge Mr Justice MacDonald ruled today that the English legal proceedings launched by the vocalist prior to Christmas might be stopped. Court procedures can instead continue in New York, where Rocco was previously dealing with his mother

Problem is, the judge likewise alerted that Madonna and Ritchie deal with a disaster if they continue their legal battle over their teen kid. Rebecca Harling, household law lawyer at Thomas Eggar, part of the Irwin Mitchell Group, says:

This is an extremely unfortunate case and eventually fruitless for Madonna, as Rocco, at the age of 15, will eventually vote with his feet and live where he decides. At 15, and thought about to be fully grown, articulate and reflective by the judge, his wishes and sensations would be a significant element for the court in deciding where he is to live. It is likely that Rocco originally opted to continue to be with his daddy in London following contact and Madonna would be well-advised to cease all lawsuits and aim to fix the matter agreeably in order to restore the on-going relationship with her boy.

But our rock-star watch shows that things might be searching for questionable rapper Kanye West.

In 2014, the judge threw the book at Kim Kardashian s significant other for his involvement in a stunning scuffle with a paparazzi photographer. West was put on 24 months probation and was sentenced to 250 hours community service. He s now seeking to have his record expunged to have the slate wiped clean after he took his punishment extra seriously as well as put in more community service hours than he was required to.

A decision has yet to be given on the matter however, according to the United States press, it s basically guaranteed that the 38-year-old will achieve success in his request.

Read More